Bypassing the Tuition Fees: Can Canada Skip APAC’s Offshore Wind Growing Pains?

As Canada looks to establish its offshore wind sector, there is a clear opportunity to learn from the experience of more mature markets rather than repeat the same early-stage mistakes. Mingyang’s recent Memorandum of Understanding with Oceanic Wind for the 1.5 to 2 GW Hecate Strait project is therefore a significant development for the Pacific coast.

The partnership brings international offshore wind experience into a Canadian market that is still taking shape. Mingyang’s work across Asia-Pacific has exposed it to many of the challenges that emerging offshore wind markets face, from localisation requirements and supply chain constraints to pricing pressure and regulatory change. That experience should be valuable as Canada begins to build projects at scale.

What makes the Hecate Strait project particularly notable is the combination of global offshore wind expertise with an Indigenous-led development model. If delivered well, this could help Canada develop its offshore wind sector in a way that is commercially credible, locally grounded and informed by lessons from other markets.

​

APAC vs Canada in Offshore Wind

APAC's offshore wind journey offers Canada a treasure trove of hard-won lessons. Taiwan's experience stands as a cautionary tale about rigid localisation mandates - their initial 60% local content requirements sparked WTO disputes and project delays before being abandoned entirely. Japan's auction design exposed how aggressive underbidding can cripple entire programmes, with Mitsubishi withdrawing from three projects after costs more than doubled to exceed JPY1 trillion. South Korea's recent legislative overhaul demonstrates the importance of addressing local opposition whilst streamlining regulatory processes.

Canada possesses distinct advantages that APAC markets could only dream of during their early development phases. Around 90% of offshore petroleum workers hold transferable skills, providing Canada with a ready-made workforce that mirrors Norway's successful transition model. Bill C-49 establishes clear tenure regimes from the outset, whilst Nova Scotia's 5 GW target by 2030 comes with streamlined regulatory frameworks. The key lies in balancing domestic supply chain ambitions with project viability - something Taiwan learned the hard way.

The numbers tell a story about timing and opportunity. Canada stands poised to launch its offshore wind sector just as global markets hit their stride - Asia installed approximately 117 GW worldwide in 2024 alone, with Taiwan achieving 3.04 GW despite its early missteps. The Ming Yang and Oceanic Wind MOU for the Hecate Strait project, targeting between 1.5GW and 2GW of electricity, demonstrates growing international confidence in Indigenous-led clean energy development. Whilst no offshore wind projects operate in Canada yet, market conditions are improving steadily, with Nova Scotia expecting its first operational farm by 2030. Canada's ambition to offer leases for 5 GW by 2030 positions the country to benefit from APAC's expensive education without paying the same tuition fees.

The Reveals from APAC's Offshore Wind Journey

Taiwan's offshore wind sector expanded rapidly to 4.4 GW of operational or under-construction capacity, yet this growth came at a considerable cost. The government's initial 60% local content requirements aimed to build domestic supply chains. These stringent localisation rules created significant implementation difficulties for developers, particularly European companies, and sparked a World Trade Organisation dispute with the EU. The outcome was telling. By 2024, Taiwan committed to dropping localisation requirements entirely in future allocation rounds, recognising that rigid local content rules threatened project viability and grid connection schedules.

South Korea chose a different path entirely. The country passed its Special Act on the Promotion of Offshore Wind Power Distribution and Industrial Development in February 2025, fundamentally restructuring its approach. This legislation closed the previous open-door, developer-led system. Instead, it favoured government-designated power generation zones with a one-stop-shop permitting process. The reform addresses local opposition from fishing communities whilst streamlining a previously fragmented regulatory environment involving multiple ministries.

Japan's experience exposed the perils of aggressive auction design. Mitsubishi's withdrawal from three projects in August 2025 followed ambitious 2021 bidding that left insufficient buffers when project costs more than doubled to exceed JPY1 trillion. The lesson was stark: underbidding creates more problems than it solves. The Philippines demonstrated a contrasting approach, awarding 92 offshore wind service contracts representing 66 GW of potential capacity and launching its first dedicated offshore wind auction in 2025.

Canada Builds Its Offshore Wind Foundation

Bill C-49 received Royal Assent on October 3, 2024, fundamentally reshaping Canada's offshore wind regulatory landscape. The legislation amends both the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act, establishing a land tenure regime for submerged land licences whilst expanding regulatory authority to offshore renewable energy projects. Nova Scotia adopted mirror legislation through Bill 471. Newfoundland and Labrador's Bill 90 came into force on June 2, 2025.

The Atlantic provinces are pursuing ambitious capacity targets. Nova Scotia plans to offer licences for 5 GW of offshore wind by 2030, with the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Energy Regulator launching the first call for bids prequalification process in October 2025. The province's Wind West initiative expands these ambitions significantly to 66 GW of installed capacity. Four offshore wind energy areas have been designated: French Bank, Middle Bank, Sable Island Bank, and Sydney Bight.

The Pacific coast presents different opportunities. The Oceanic Wind project in Hecate Strait targets 600-700 MW in its first phase. The site offers exceptional Class 7 wind conditions with average speeds exceeding 10 metres per second and winter capacity factors over 65%. Coast Tsimshian Enterprises, a partnership between Metlakatla and Lax Kw'alaams First Nations, holds joint development rights. This Indigenous-led approach reflects a distinctly Canadian model for offshore wind development.

Nova Scotia signed an agreement with Massachusetts on February 4, 2026, to supply clean energy from offshore wind. The cross-border arrangement signals how Canada's offshore wind sector could serve both domestic needs and export markets.

What Canada Can Borrow from Asia's Hard-Won Experience

Canada's offshore wind ambitions benefit from an unexpected advantage: its established oil and gas sector. Approximately 90% of offshore petroleum workers possess skills with medium-to-high transferability to offshore renewables. The transition pathway mirrors Equinor's successful model, where Norwegian oil platform workers constructed the world's first floating offshore wind farm near Peterhead, Scotland, using expertise identical to offshore oil and gas operations. This crossover potential positions Canada uniquely compared to countries building offshore wind industries from scratch.

The financial architecture presents a more complex challenge. Offshore wind requires approximately 70% debt financing, where a 1% interest rate increase raises levelised energy costs by 10-15%. Project finance on a non-recourse basis, tested successfully in Europe's Q7 and C-Power projects, proved resilient despite construction incidents. Canada's 2022 federal budget allocated CAD 250 million over four years for clean electricity pre-development activities, with offshore wind projects eligible subject to specific criteria. The question becomes whether this funding structure can withstand the financial pressures that derailed Japan's aggressive bidding strategy.

Taiwan's abandoned localisation requirements offer perhaps the most instructive lesson for Canadian policymakers. The country's initial 60% localisation mandate created WTO disputes before being dropped entirely in future rounds. Canada must balance domestic supply chain development against project viability - a delicate equation that Taiwan learned the hard way. The planned Sea-Breeze Tech Demonstration Project in Nova Scotia will use existing undersea cables from the abandoned offshore natural gas sector, demonstrating how infrastructure reuse could provide a middle path between foreign dependence and unrealistic domestic mandates.

Conclusion

Canada stands at a unique crossroads in offshore wind development. The country can avoid costly missteps by learning from APAC's experience, particularly Taiwan's abandoned local content requirements and Japan's underbidding crisis. With transferable oil and gas expertise, improving regulatory frameworks, and strategic partnerships already in place, Canada possesses distinct advantages. Success depends on balanced policy design that prioritises project viability over rigid localization mandates whilst ensuring adequate financial structuring. The first projects will demonstrate whether Canada can translate these lessons into competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1. What is Canada's offshore wind capacity target by 2030? 

Canada aims to offer leases for 5 GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030, with Nova Scotia leading the charge through its first call for bids. The province's longer-term Wind West initiative sets an even more ambitious goal of 66 GW of installed capacity, positioning Canada as an emerging player in the global offshore wind market.

Q2. How does Canada's offshore wind development compare to Asia-Pacific markets? 

Whilst Asia-Pacific markets have already installed approximately 117 GW of offshore wind capacity globally in 2024, with Taiwan alone operating 4.4 GW, Canada has yet to build its first offshore wind farm. However, Canada expects to see its first operational project in Nova Scotia by 2030 and can benefit from learning from APAC's policy mistakes and successes.

Q3. What lessons can Canada learn from Taiwan's offshore wind experience? 

Taiwan's experience demonstrates the risks of overly strict local content requirements. The country initially mandated 60% local content, which created implementation difficulties for developers and sparked a WTO dispute with the EU. By 2024, Taiwan committed to dropping these localisation requirements entirely, recognising they threatened project viability—a crucial lesson for Canada's policy design.

Q4. How can Canada's oil and gas expertise support offshore wind development? 

Approximately 90% of offshore petroleum workers possess skills with medium-to-high transferability to offshore renewables. Canada can leverage its established oil and gas sector expertise for offshore wind construction and operations, similar to how Norwegian oil platform workers successfully built the world's first floating offshore wind farm in Scotland.

Q5. What are the main financial challenges for Canada's offshore wind projects? 

Offshore wind requires approximately 70% debt financing, where a 1% interest rate increase can raise levelised energy costs by 10-15%. Canada must ensure adequate financial structuring and avoid the underbidding crisis that plagued Japan's market, where aggressive 2021 bidding left projects financially unviable when costs more than doubled.